In a detailed letter to the poll body, signatories argued that the Prime Minister’s recent speech on state media platforms violated the Model Code of Conduct and disrupted the level playing field.

The Core Controversy
More than 700 prominent citizens comprising retired civil servants, scholars, and rights activists have formally challenged the legality of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s April 18 televised address. In their petition to the Election Commission of India (ECI), they allege the broadcast breached the Model Code of Conduct (MCC). The group contends that using state-funded channels like Doordarshan and All India Radio for a politically charged speech provides the ruling party with an unfair advantage during an active election cycle.
The Legal Argument
The complaint, submitted on April 20, asserts that the address crossed the line from official duty into “partisan propaganda.” Under the MCC guidelines, ministers are strictly prohibited from mixing official visits with electioneering or utilizing government resources to influence voters. With high-stakes assembly elections currently underway in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu, the signatories argue that such broadcasts undermine the democratic necessity of a fair and balanced electoral environment.
Demand for Accountability
Beyond just an inquiry, the citizens have demanded significant remedial measures. They have urged the ECI to ensure that opposition parties receive equal airtime on public broadcasters to counter the narrative. Furthermore, the petition specifically asks for the removal of the speech from official digital archives if it is found to be in violation of the rules. High-profile names among the 700 signatories include former Delhi LG Najeeb Jung, activist Yogendra Yadav, and musician TM Krishna.
What Triggered the Outcry?
The friction stems from the Prime Minister’s remarks following the legislative failure of the 131st Constitutional Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha. In his address, PM Modi lashed out at the Opposition, specifically naming the Congress, TMC, and DMK. He accused them of “crushing the dreams of women” by blocking the bill, which sought to link women’s reservation with seat delimitation. By framing the legislative defeat as an “attack on the dignity of women,” the PM turned a parliamentary outcome into a potent campaign theme, which critics say was an abuse of his official platform.








